Q. History of European French billiards (carom) cues.
Here
is a 140 cm long mace, probably English dating from around 1800,
of
which the mahogany head
......
is
provided with a central sight line, see picture left (*).
This very rare type of instrument is the precursor of the current
billiard cue. It was already used in the 1620s to shove a billiard
ball with its head as can be seen in the painting 'A Game of Billiards'
[i], dating from around 1620-1626, by Adriaen van de Venne .
The
player is Frederik Henry, Prince of Orange, count of Nassau.
Louis XIV uses a longer mace in a print of 'Third apartment' [ii] dating
from 1694, engraved by Antoine Trouvain (1656-1705).
Ladies
of the time also play with a mace in the drawing 'Le Noble jeu de billard'
(1643) [iii] by Abraham Bosse (1602-1676).
In
the detail below, you will notice a lady holding in her hand a mace
turned on its side, a "sweeping" position that enables to
roll her ball - keeping close contact with it - on the billiard table.
Note
that the mace handle called tail or cue was sometimes also used to push
a ball [1].
The
progressive replacement of a mace by an untipped billiard cue that
could only hit the centre of a balll, began around 1680, was already
well advanced in 1700, and lasted until about 1900 [1].
Billiard
cues dating from the 1700s and the early 1800s are shown in:
-
'La partie de billard' [iv], made around 1725 by the famous painter
Jean-Baptiste Chardin (1699-1779), whose father (Jean) was a member
of the carpenter corporation of Paris in 1701 and was billiard maker
[2].
-
the
drawing 'Ladies and gentlemen playing billiards' dating from 1756
[v], by Johan Esaias Nilson (1721-1788). It
should be pointed out that gentlemen already use billiard cues while
ladies still prefer maces, probably to be able to bend less and
keep elegant (see for example the drawing 'le Noble jeu de billard'
above).
-
the
painting 'Jeu de billard' (1807) [iv] by Louis Léopold
Boilly (1761-1845), where a woman plays with a billiard cue.
-
a
German watercolour (ca. 1745) shown in [3] page 65, in which the
cue is adorned with a triangular plate for use of its butt end as
a mace.
-
figures
of bevelled cues (16-18) and one-piece maces (19 and 20), of various
sizes,
...
from Recueil de planches sur les sciences
et les arts de l' Encyclopédie Diderot et d'Alembert,
tome VIII, Paris, France, 1771, plate IV. Both ends of these instruments
were used to play at billiards. Cues (17 and 18) were known as a
'Geoffrey' [4]. Their bevelled point could hit a ball
below center.
Note
that Marie Antoinette (1755-1793) used a one-piece ivory mace with a
carved gold head [5] (made by Jean-Antoine Belleteste 1731-1811). Napoleon
(1769-1821) played with a monobloc cue as can be seen in [3] p. 31 where
he is represented with his wife Marie-Louise of Austria and Marshal
Ney. According to Gelli [6], the cue, crafted by an Italian cabinetmaker,
was made of rosewood and decorated with several ivory inlays, including
imperial emblems. The one he had in exile on St. Helena island was not
decorated and 1.37 m long [7].
Sometime
between 1807 and 1818, billiard cues began to be tipped with leather.
This invention attributed to François Mingaud
[vi]
and the use of chalk finally enabled the players to apply "English"
(= "side") to the cue ball by striking it off centre.
Two-piece
cues appeared in 1829 [1].
Who
built the oldest French billiard cues?
Originally,
the builders may have been corporations making furniture and occasionally
some billiard tables and cues ([4], p. 495). In France, these corporations
consisted of craftsmen (cabinetmaker, wood carver, gilder, designer
...) who were restricted to the conduct of only one trade, as for example
the father of Jean-Baptiste Chardin (**). The Allarde decree of 1791
removed these corporations and their rules. From that time on a cabinetmaker
was for example allowed to open a workshop where billiard cues were
made and decorated. French firms whose activity was solely billiards
gradually appeared: Chéreau in 1816, Hiolle in 1820 and Hénin
Aîné in 1830.
Hiolle is the first one to build only cues.
According
to the 1831's 'Dictionnaire Technologique ou Nouveau Dictionnaire Universel'
(tome 18, p. 69-71, Librairie Thomine, Paris, France), Hiolle at that
time already:
-
glued
veal head skin cue tips on a harder leather base which itself was
affixed to an ivory ferrule
-
sometimes
covered with ivory and veal head skin the butt end of a cue, provided
with two opposite triangular bevels to use it also as a mace (see
Section L. 2. d)
-
manufactured
cues/canes with screws similar to the one shown in Section J. 2.
Other billiard firms, like Finck (1839), Dorfelder (ca. 1860) and Schröder
& Kartzke (1884)
in
Germany, Sampaio (1880) in Portugal, Brunswick (1894) in France, and
Van Laere (1906) in Belgium (see more firms )
were set up later and there were gradually fewer and fewer craftsmen.
Unsigned
billiard cues from the 1800s are shown in:
They
are marquetry cues.
The first one, without splice, is the oldest and dates from about 1825.
The Boulle marquetry of the last two is very rare. All cues are monobloc
except the next to last.
- an
engraving of 1837 by Charrier (see Section D. Rare Books) where the
cues are monobloc with triangle and tip without ferrule.
-
two Finck's catalogues which can be found in reference [4]. One of
them, black and white, p 284 - 285, is relative to the period from
1840 to 1880. The other one, colour, pp. 94- 95, is not dated. The
cues shown there were also sold by Schröder
& Kartzke (***). Below, some of them
in
different styles and designs.
The
first signatures appeared in the late 1800s.
A catalogue of the firm Barbier Fils (***) informs about billiard cues
sold in Paris in 1901. Here are a few of them
without
splice (1 to 3) or with forked (4, 5, 8 and 9) or '4-point' (6 and 7)
splices, bordered or not by veneers (****). They are provided with bevels,
simple (2 and 3 with escutcheon) or adorned with mother-of-pearl arrows
(triangular plates) with veneers (4 to 9). Cues 8 and 9 are decorated
with wooden marquetry. Other materials such as copper or ivory are also
listed, as well as the possibility of adding splices, a screw in the
middle, a rubber bumper, etc... Note that the price of a cue can thus
increase by a factor of 50.
The
early 1900s were particularly rich in inventions. Cues, signed, patented
and bearing names,
from
bottom to top 'La ROYALE', 'La VICTORIEUSE', 'La TECHNIQUE', 'La St.
MICHEL', 'L'UNIVERSELLE', 'La MONARCH', 'La GALLIA', 'La REFORM', 'La
St. MARTIN', were
created in various countries. They were in 2 to 4 parts, often with
variable weights and some of them were produced for more than 50 years
(for more details see Section A).
Around 1920, marquetry cues, such as those in Section M, and 'cue-maces',
like the one
described
in Section J. 1, stopped being manufactured. From
that date on, triangular plates disappeared and almost all cues have
borne the stamp of their manufacturers.
Section G gathers more than 230 cues of 38 firms from 7 different countries.
These cues differ in their shape (truncated cone, 'bottle', 'hexagonal'
and 'fancy turned'), number of pieces (1 to 4) and points (0 to 8),
construction wood, carvings, inlays and grips. Here are some of them:
six
Hiolles
and,
from
top to bottom, two Hénin Aînés, one Brunswick, two
Van Laeres, one Sampaio and one Finck.
It
should be pointed out that most of these firms have closed now and that
Hiolle, Hénin Aîné and Van Laere were among those
that existed the longest.
Below,
a few fine handmade carvings combined with big mother-of-pearl inlays.
Other
even rarer materials, such as: gilt bronze, ceramic, tortoise shell
and exotic essences,
are
also present in the two Boulle marquetry cues already shown above.
And
finally, here are the results of a study of all the cues of the collection
shown in Sections B, G and M.
In general:
-
from
1825 to 1980, the diameter (d) of the butt end of a cue gradually
decreases from ± 36 to 31 mm and that of the other end from
± 17 to 10 mm. The second decrease is proportionally bigger
(41 versus 14 %). It is shown below for two cues, one very old dating
from 1825 (d = 17 mm) which never had a cue tip (or which lost it)
and the other one dating from 1980 (d = 11.5 mm), i.e. a 32 percent
decrease.
.....
-
from
the late 1800s, cues in several parts saw the diameter of their collar
gradually pass from 19 to 22 mm and their balance point move away
from the butt end
-
the
butt end of all the cues is very fragile until about 1920, as well
as the butt joint of more than one piece cues. Few of them remained
intact until today
-
the
wooden joints far outweigh those in metal.
______________________________________________________________________________________
[[1]
SHAMOS Michaël, The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Billiards. Ed. Lyons
& Burford, New York, U.S.A., 1993.
[2] de SALVESTRE François, Les ébénistes du XVIIIIe
siècle. Ed. G. Van Oest et Cie, Paris - Bruxelles, Belgium, 1923,
page 49.
[3] SHAMOS Michaël, Le billard et le billard américain,
Ed. Minerva, Paris - Genève,1992.
[4] STEIN V. and RUBINO P., The Billiard Encyclopedia. An Illustrated
History of the Sport. Balkline Press Inc., New York, U.S.A., 2008.
[5] Madame CAMPAN, Mémoires sur la vie privée de Marie-Antoinette.
Ed. Mongie Aîné, Paris, France, 1822, Tome 1, page 283.
[6] GELLI Jacopo, Il biliardo. Ed. Hoepli, Milan, Italy, 1906, page
86.
[7]
Musée des châteaux de Malmaison et de Bois-Préau,
France.
(*)
The identification of this two-piece mace is based on the shape of its
head, the angle of attachment of the handle (see photo on the right)
and William Hendricks' History of Billiards. Ed Hendricks, Roxana, U.S.A.,
1974.
(**)
Note that
André-Charles Boulle (1642-1732), raised to the rank of First
cabinetmaker of Louis XIV, was not subjected to this restriction.
(***) See
Section Books F. Catalogues.
(****)
These cues are also shown in the catalogue of Gobin Frères (Bagnolet,
France) of 1912 (***).
Credits:
[i] British Museum, London.
[ii] Source gallica.bnf.fr / BnF.
[iii] Copyright: Musée des Beaux-arts de Rennes - Jean-manuel
Salingue.
[iv] WahooArt.com.
[v] National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C;
[vi] Uknown authorUnknown author, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
Menu
|